0.06/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.33	% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
0.11/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.11/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:51:54 EDT 2022
0.11/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.45	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.18/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.18/0.45	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.18/0.54	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.18/0.54	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# post_as_ho1 with pid 28469 completed with status 0
0.18/0.54	# Result found by post_as_ho1
0.18/0.54	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.18/0.54	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.54	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF21-SSSFFMBN
0.18/0.54	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.18/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# new_ho_10 with pid 28475 completed with status 0
0.18/0.54	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.18/0.54	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.18/0.54	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.54	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF21-SSSFFMBN
0.18/0.54	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.18/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.18/0.54	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.18/0.54	
0.18/0.54	# Proof found!
0.18/0.54	# SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.54	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_22, type, cK: (a > $o) > a > $o).
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_2: (a > $o) > (a > $o) > a).
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_24, type, esk2_0: a).
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_25, type, esk3_1: (a > $o) > a).
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_26, type, epred1_0: a > $o).
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_27, type, esk4_2: a > (a > $o) > a).
0.18/0.54	thf(decl_28, type, epred2_1: a > a > $o).
0.18/0.54	thf(cTHM90A_pme, conjecture, (![X1:a]:(((cK @ (^[X2:a]:(![X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ X2)<=![X4:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4))))))) @ X1)<=![X3:a > $o]:((![X2:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ X2)=>(X3 @ X2)))=>(X3 @ X1)))))<=![X5:a > $o, X6:a > $o]:((![X1:a]:(((X5 @ X1)=>(X6 @ X1)))=>![X1:a]:(((cK @ X6 @ X1)<=(cK @ X5 @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM90A_pme)).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X5:a > $o, X6:a > $o]:((![X1:a]:(((X5 @ X1)=>(X6 @ X1)))=>![X1:a]:(((cK @ X5 @ X1)=>(cK @ X6 @ X1)))))=>![X1:a]:((![X3:a > $o]:((![X2:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ X2)=>(X3 @ X2)))=>(X3 @ X1)))=>(cK @ (^[Z0:a]:(![X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ Z0)<=![X4:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4))))))) @ X1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM90A_pme])])])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X14:a > $o, X15:a > $o, X17:a, X19:a > $o]:(((((X14 @ (esk1_2 @ X14 @ X15))|(~(cK @ X14 @ X17)|(cK @ X15 @ X17)))&(~(X15 @ (esk1_2 @ X14 @ X15))|(~(cK @ X14 @ X17)|(cK @ X15 @ X17))))&((((cK @ X19 @ (esk3_1 @ X19))|(X19 @ esk2_0))&(~(X19 @ (esk3_1 @ X19))|(X19 @ esk2_0)))&~(cK @ (^[Z0:a]:(![X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ Z0)<=![X4:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4))))))) @ esk2_0)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X5))|(cK @ X5 @ X1)|~((cK @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk3_1 @ X3))|(X3 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X24:a, X25:a > $o, X28:a]:(((((cK @ X25 @ (esk4_2 @ X24 @ X25))|(X25 @ X24)|~(epred1_0 @ X24))&(~(X25 @ (esk4_2 @ X24 @ X25))|(X25 @ X24)|~(epred1_0 @ X24)))&((~(cK @ (epred2_1 @ X24) @ X28)|(epred2_1 @ X24 @ X28)|(epred1_0 @ X24))&(~(epred2_1 @ X24 @ X24)|(epred1_0 @ X24))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])])])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ X1)|~((X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X5 @ X3)))|~((cK @ X5 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X5:a > $o]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk3_1 @ X5))|(X5 @ (esk1_2 @ X5 @ X3))|(X5 @ esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X1 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ X1)|~((cK @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk4_2 @ X1 @ X3))|(X3 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((X3 @ X1)|~((X3 @ (esk4_2 @ X1 @ X3)))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X6:a > $o, X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X5) @ X6))|(cK @ X6 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X5)))|(cK @ X5 @ esk2_0)|~((X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X5 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X1 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((cK @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X3) @ X5))|(cK @ X5 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X3)))|(cK @ X3 @ esk2_0)|(epred1_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ (epred2_1 @ X1)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X6:a > $o, X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X5) @ X6))|(cK @ X6 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X5)))|(cK @ X5 @ esk2_0)|(X5 @ (esk1_2 @ X5 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_7])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X23:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X23)<=>![X21:a > $o]:(((X21 @ X23)<=![X22:a]:(((cK @ X21 @ X22)=>(X21 @ X22))))))), introduced(definition)).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X1)|~((epred2_1 @ X1 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X3) @ X5))|(cK @ X5 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X3)))|(cK @ X3 @ esk2_0)|(epred1_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ (epred2_1 @ X1)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_13])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o, X1:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X1 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X3) @ X5))|(cK @ X5 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X3)))|(X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ (epred2_1 @ X1)))|(cK @ X3 @ esk2_0)|(epred1_0 @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_14])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~((((cK @ epred1_0 @ esk2_0))=(($true)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_15])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X5)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X5) @ X3))|(cK @ X5 @ esk2_0)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X5 @ (epred2_1 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X5) @ X3))))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ (epred2_1 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X3) @ X5))))|(cK @ X5 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ X3)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ X3) @ X5))|(cK @ X3 @ esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_18])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ~((cK @ epred1_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((cK @ X3 @ (esk3_1 @ X5))|(X5 @ esk2_0)|~((X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X5 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_4])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X3:a > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_2 @ (cK @ epred1_0) @ X3))|(cK @ X3 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ epred1_0))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ esk2_0)|~((X3 @ (esk3_1 @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (cK @ epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (cK @ epred1_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_22])).
0.18/0.54	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_22]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.54	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.54	# Parsed axioms                        : 3
0.18/0.54	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.18/0.54	# Initial clauses                      : 11
0.18/0.54	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
0.18/0.54	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
0.18/0.54	# Processed clauses                    : 287
0.18/0.54	# ...of these trivial                  : 2
0.18/0.54	# ...subsumed                          : 137
0.18/0.54	# ...remaining for further processing  : 148
0.18/0.54	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.18/0.54	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.54	# Backward-subsumed                    : 15
0.18/0.54	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.18/0.54	# Generated clauses                    : 3572
0.18/0.54	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3414
0.18/0.54	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.54	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
0.18/0.54	# Paramodulations                      : 3532
0.18/0.54	# Factorizations                       : 40
0.18/0.54	# NegExts                              : 0
0.18/0.54	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.18/0.54	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.54	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.54	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.54	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.54	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.54	# Current number of processed clauses  : 123
0.18/0.54	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.18/0.54	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.54	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.18/0.54	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 118
0.18/0.54	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3130
0.18/0.54	# ...number of literals in the above   : 22175
0.18/0.54	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.54	# Current number of archived clauses   : 25
0.18/0.54	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6937
0.18/0.54	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1424
0.18/0.54	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 162
0.18/0.54	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
0.18/0.54	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.54	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.18/0.54	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.18/0.54	# Condensation attempts                : 287
0.18/0.54	# Condensation successes               : 5
0.18/0.54	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 125455
0.18/0.54	
0.18/0.54	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.54	# User time                : 0.078 s
0.18/0.54	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.18/0.54	# Total time               : 0.082 s
0.18/0.54	# Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
0.18/0.54	
0.18/0.54	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.54	# User time                : 0.078 s
0.18/0.54	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.18/0.54	# Total time               : 0.085 s
0.18/0.54	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.18/0.54	EOF